The track-focused rough edges are tangible, the price tag astronomical, and the waiting list as long as the Mulsanne straight. We finally drive the Ford GT

WORDS BEN BARRY

RAW& ORDER

The track-focused rough edges are tangible, the price tag astronomical, and the waiting list as long as the Mulsanne straight. We finally drive the Ford GT

ORD originally planned to return to Le Mans last year with a Mustang. To mark 50 years since the GT40 placed 1-2-3, avenging Enzo Ferrari’s refusal to sell to the Blue Oval, it wanted to beat the Ferrari 488 GTB and others in the top-tier, production-based LM GTE class. With a muscle car.

Today, standing next to the beautiful Ford GT road car we’re about to drive around the Utah Motorsports Campus near Salt Lake City, Ford Performance boss Dave Pericak explains that as the project progressed, so the Mustang Le Mans racer – dubbed Project Silver, after the Lone Ranger’s horse – strayed further and further from the production car. It wasn’t a lot like a Mustang, was inherently more compromised than ‘pure’ sports cars, and nothing at all like the GT40 they hoped to honour. Finally, the nag was put out to pasture in 2013 with the Le Mans anniversary just three years away. Things didn’t look good.

Then, as Pericak tells it, a ‘skunkworks’ team was set up without the knowledge of top brass; a team of 20 or so working in secrecy in the basement after-hours and during weekends – this all sounds too perfect to be true,

but it’s a nice story – working on an actual modern-day GT40 to win LM GTE, and both showcase and develop technology with wider applications for Ford’s range.

With such a short timeframe, the engineers and designers collaborated closely, the former freed from the constraints of an existing design, the designers pondering whether to make a modern interpretation of the GT40 (like the 2004-06 generation), a ruthlessly aero-optimised body like LaFerrari/P1, or to aim for ‘modernity and seductive aesthetics’.

Led by design director Craig Metros, the team eventually settled on all three, and the result is a carbonfibre-bodied design that’s both highly evocative of the original GT40 but adds a modern, technical twist, including those ‘floating’ buttresses that channel air down the car’s pinched body sides – and channel air inside them, from the intercoolers to the engine intake. Gorgeous.

Bosses Bill Ford and Alan Mullaly were shown a mock-up… you’ll probably know the rest: the GT finished first, beating the Ferrari 488 into second place; the remaining GTs finished third, fourth and ninth.

That Ford started fresh with a clean-sheet design is crucial: while its rivals converted road cars into racecars, with all the compromises that involves, Ford was busy crafting the perfect race car that they’d turn into a road car later, with all the compromises that involves.

All this means the GT’s ingredients are far more exotic than a Porsche 911, Ferrari 488 GTB or Aston Martin Vantage. In fact, the Ford GT is redolent of a ‘budget’ LaFerrari, as far as you can call it budget at around A$500,000 before taxes, or about the price of a Lamborghini Aventador S in the US. Even so, a vetting process and requirements not to sell the car for a couple of years – and to give Ford first refusal when owners do – hasn’t stymied demand.

The GT is a brilliant track car; it’s no wonder the racecar was so dominant

Built solely in left-hand-drive alongside the racecars at engineering firm and race shop Multimatic in Canada, the GT is based around a carbonfibre monocoque. The central tub is assembled from 45 pieces, with the bonding process said to soak up any variability in production for perfect consistency

THE GENERATIONS

GT40 1964-69 ENGINE 4.7-litre V8 (Mk1, ’64-65) POWER 250kW (approx) TORQUE 450Nm (approx) PRICE US$18,500 (approx) GT 2005-06 5.4-litre V8, supercharged 410kW 678Nm US$140,000-$150,000 GT 2017 3.5-litre V6, twin turbo 482kW 746Nm A$500,000 (estimated) 7 A

RIPPER STRIPPER

It’s tight in here. One XL-sized journo described the sensation of sitting next to a hefty instructor as like two doonas stuffed into a Kelvinator. Compact aero was the priority over cabin roominess 1 2 Ford describes this as a ‘race-inspired stalkless wheel’, and suggests that because the racecar doesn’t have an indicator stalk, this car should not either. It’s partly to avoid the stretch to the dash, as the seats are fixed 2 3 Select ‘track’, hit ‘ok’ and the GT drops 50mm on its clever suspension as if the pit crew has just dumped you off the air jacks.

Exciting before a hot-lap session; a bit try-hard outside a crowded cafe 3

throughout the planned four-year, 1000-car run.

The instrument panel forms an integral the structure, and the rollcage is built directly into the monocoque, its bones disguised the road car but requiring only bolt-on components to transform into the racecar’s full cage.

Double wishbone suspension reaches deep ar part of rectly by trim in omponents eep into the centre line of the chassis, cleaning up the airflow the centre line of the chassis, cleaning up the airflow beneath the car to create a ‘keel’-style front end. It’s also why the GT has a turning circle to shame With the rear wing deployed, vents open of the GT, increasing frontal downforce to complement extra downforce at the rear. The total increases from 45kg to 154kg.

A 3.5-litre twin-turbocharged V6 Ecoboost engine is mounted behind the driver, connected to a seven-speed dual-clutch gearbox, 482kW and 746Nm going to the rear wheels alone.

Press the starter and there’s a raucous, race car whirr of fuel pump, and the GT fires with a gruff, deep idle. It’s a V6 so it isn’t as tuneful as a Lamborghini or Ferrari, but it is compact and that’s also key to the GT’s tapered, slippery bodywork. Sixty percent of the dry-sumped unit is shared with the Ford Raptor and when you blip the long-travel throttle the revs respond hungrily, with none of the turbo-induced sogginess you feel in – niche but relevant reference, here – the Radical RXC Turbo, another road car that looks like a Le Mans car and uses an Ecoboosted V6.

Minimising drag is key to achieving big speeds on the high-speed straights at Le Mans. The GT isn’t quite the nt a Focus RS. en at the front 40 inches (1016mm) to the top of the windscreen that gave the GT40 its name, but when you drop it on its trick suspension (more later), it’s pretty close at 41.8inches (1063mm). The frontal area is also far smaller than, say, a Ferrari 488, with obvious consequences for the road car. The low roof, the dihedral door that aims at your face like 1 th tric 41.8 sm con dih those huge foam pointy fingers worn by football fans, those huge foam pointy fingers worn by football fans, and a fat chunk of carbonfibre sill all make getting into the thing pretty inelegant.

When you do, you slot into low-slung seats fixed directly to the floor (though they do recline), allowing the chassis to taper aggressively ahead of you and provide that small frontal area; the seat bolsters squash right up against the chassis.

To get comfortable, you move the pedal box by pulling on a strap, and adjust the oblong, Alcantarawrapped steering wheel – covered in buttons for everything from the five driving modes to the wipers and indicators – towards you. Stowage space? Pah! The ‘trunk’ only just holds race boots.

Before the launch, Ford asked if we were taller than 185cm, because we might need a special helmet if we were. I’m 185.5cm, guessed I’d be okay, but it’s pretty marginal in here, a few centimetres spare without the helmet; lid on, I have to lean the seat back a little to cheat the space. An instructor sits alongside, and we brush shoulders it’s so narrow in here. With unlacquered carbonfibre everywhere, it’s a dark, functional, weapons-grade kind of interior, one that raises excitement and trepidation in equal measure.

BoP ON HEAD

The 2016 Le Mans GTs were whacked with a Balance of Power impost at the eleventh hour, which cut power by 1.3 percent through boost pressure regulation at certain engine revs, and added 10kg of ballast to the chassis.

Despite their obvious, crushing pace in the race, the LM GTE racers cut their times via corner speed rather than outright snot.

About 375kW is likely all they had – around 100kW less than the road car.

It isn’t as tuneful as a Lambo or Ferrari but it responds hungrily to the throttle

Sitting in the pitlane, I scroll past Wet, Normal, Sport modes and select Track, with only low-drag V-Max mode left on the table and key for the 344km/h top speed we won’t get close to today. Press ‘ok’ and the ride height falls from 120mm to 70mm in a split second. A pushrod mounted to the lower wishbone acts on a torsion bar and a conventional spring, both of which do some springing. But in Track, the pushrod compresses, the car drops and the coil spring is locked out by a hydraulic actuator, becoming squashed and solid, not long and – technical term – springy, leaving the torsion bar to absorb bumps. The pushrod also acts on DSSV (Dynamic Suspensions Spool Valve) dampers, but they’re hidden away at the front of the cockpit and feature three settings. Unusually, this means that both spring and damper rates adapt on the fly to suit each other, where normally a fixed-spring rate must work with multiple damper rates, a compromise.

I accelerate out of the pit exit, worried I’ll scrape the pit wall, so wide does this car feel, despite its narrow cockpit. Yet it’s amazing how easy it is to settle into driving the GT quickly.

It hauls robustly from low revs, feels eyes-on-stalks alert at the front, and steers with a hydraulically assisted rack that’s swift without nervousness, physically meaty without excessive weight. With the spring rate doubled, there’s very little bodyroll, yet still a high degree of compliance to soak up kerbs. You notice the slight fuzz to the brake pedal just before you clamp pads to huge 394mm carbon-ceramic front discs, and that the gearshifts are quick but lack the mechanical snap you get with a Ferrari or a Porsche.

But you’re comfortable, ready to attack.

The V6 is plenty powerful for Le Mans; in fact, the GT racecar is so competent that the Balance of Performance rules knock it back from 482kW to 373kW to give the others a chance. But in road car trim you could argue things have moved on since we first saw the GT over two years ago, what with the McLaren 720S sailing past 520kW. At 1385kg dry, it’s also around 100kg chunkier than the McLaren.

Figures be damned, because on track the GT feels mighty quick, and Ford claims it beat the McLaren 675LT it benchmarked on every track it tested on.

Despite peak torque listed at a heady 5900rpm, the torque curve is flat from 4000rpm, and the GT pulls hard from under 3000rpm, kicking again at 5500rpm for a firework-like warp to the 6500rpm redline on a long, energetic spike of boost. From Sport mode and up, you get an anti-lag function that keeps boost spinning so

LAG, BANISHED

It doesn’t sound very exotic when you learn the mega-dollar Ford GT uses the same aluminium block as the 3.5-litre EcoBoost engine fitted to the F-150 pick-up, among other models. But it gets much more esoteric from there, and the anti-lag is especially cool. But not without a consumption cost.

“We certainly could have gotten more fuel economy,” says Ford tech boss Raj Nair, “but we tuned it for horsepower and throttle response.” In three of the GT’s five drive modes, anti-lag programming kicks in, sending fuel through the engine even when the throttle is closed to keep the turbos spinning.

“We completely looked at the performance metrics,” Nair says.

“The fuel economy is what it is.”

AIR CONDITIONING

The GT’s active aero package includes adjustable ride height rear spoiler that an air brake. The operate in isolation though, working in concert with car’s undertray. When the rear wing is stowed, flaps open above the front splitter to guide air through vents in the front undertray, gently diverting the aero balance rearwards.

The big wing doesn’t just change its angle, it changes its shape, extending or retracting a small Gurney flap along the trailing edge. Ford claims this des adjust an active re doubles as doesn’t op h, workin r’s under ing sto ough ven ray, gent lance re ig d angl extendin Fo G includ and a also d wing d though the car wi t thro undertr bal bi i e G e patent pending tech results in a 14 percent improvement in wing efficiency.

Another cool thing about the GT’s aero? Those flying buttresses that link the roof to the rear fenders are sneaky wings, being aerofoil shaped in profile. And there’s more.

After passing through the intercoolers in the rear fenders, air is vented out through the centres of the ring-shaped tail lights. We’re not sure about the aerodynamic benefits of that, but tail lights with hot breath have to be a first.

every time you get back on the throttle, there’s instant response, for an immediate feeling of control over the rear axle. It also sounds far more exciting as the revs scroll across the digital driver display, a far more cultured, multi-layered growl than the industrial idle suggests. Any turbo whooshiness is way down in the mix.

Soon you build the confidence to push harder, and start to get a handle on how high the grip limits of the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tyres are, that you can lean on them hard, tip-toeing on the finely defined limits as the fronts eventually start to bleed into slight understeer. It feels very rear-biased, so you have to be progressive with the throttle out of corners, but there’s still a lot of traction. And when you stand on the brakes, it’s your nerve that wimps out before they do. Get it wrong and the stability control is perfectly calibrated.

I get about eight laps, and I’m so hooked, I want to get back out there, work it harder. Kiwi Scott Dixon, who drove a GT to third at Le Mans is on hand to drive the road car for the first time and agrees. “These are great brakes for a road car,” he says. “The big difference to the racecar, really, is tyres.” Makes you wonder how far off the racecar the road car really is.

No, where the Ford GT falters is on the road, as you might expect given the racecar origins. It’s still exciting, its suspension is still wonderfully compliant, and it still flows down a tricky Utah mountain road with speed, poise and huge competence. People also whoop involuntarily when they see you. But you do notice that, while it’s very quick, the GT’s not quite got the straight-line legs of the fastest supercars.

Maybe that doesn’t matter, but the GT is also an uncompromising thing, with transverse ridges thunking up through its carbon chassis, kickback through the steering that adds more to NVH than it does communication, some inconsistent refinement Model Engine Max Power Max Torque Transmission Weight 0-100km/h Economy Price On sale Ford GT 3497cc V6 (60°), dohc, 24v, twin turbo 482kW @ 6250rpm 746Nm @ 5900rpm 7-speed dual-clutch 1385kg (dry) 2.8sec (claimed) 16.8L/100km A$500,000 (estimated) Not for Oz

from the gearbox and myriad buzzes through the carbonfibre structure, and clunks too, including the active rear spoiler slamming so crudely back into the bodywork that you glance back to see where it landed on the road.

Part of the GT’s racecar-with-numberplates appeal?

Maybe, but I’d say it’s part of the compromise that comes from engineering the racecar first, and I bet you could round off all the rough edges and create a car that’s even more enjoyable to drive on the road. I go back to the track, slightly disappointed, then pull more laps and fall in love all over again.

The GT’s a brilliant track car, no doubt about it, and its engineering is so innovative, it’s no wonder the racecar was so dominant it had to be restrained. But half a century on, Ferrari and its rivals still do it better on the road. Ironically given Ford’s blue-collar heritage, they do it for less cash, too.

It hauls robustly from low revs and feels eyes-on-stalks alert at the front