ROAD & TRACK LAST BRAGGING RITES

FORD XR6 SPRINT v FORD XR8 SPRINT v HOLDEN SS-V REDLINE

This is it folks, the last battle between Australian-made Ford and Holden V8 sports sedans – and a mighty turbo-six upstart.

Nathan Ponchard saddles up with a premium-fuelled tear in his eye to adjudicate eternal bragging rights. Will the Blue Oval bag one last victory, or will the GM Lion roar triumphant for all eternity?

Class ic SHOWDOWN

December 1982 V8s to die?

Last domestic bent-eight comparo until 1991 names VH SS Group Three “the best sports sedan for the money in the world”

USTRALIA is changing, faster than we think. In fact, it’s about to get one hell of a hurry-up as these two long-standing staples of life – the Ford Falcon and the Holden Commodore – cease to exist in their current forms.

In the Holden’s case, it will morph into a large German-built, front-drive or allwheel- drive hatchback, still wearing the Commodore nameplate. The big Ford will soon disappear into an uncaring world gorging on tubby SUVs.

At bread-and-butter level, that’s no huge deal. A Mondeo Ambiente is more accomplished than a boggo Falcon at carting people around in quiet, efficient, luxurious comfort, underpinned by a Ford of Europe chassis brimming with sophisticated spirit. But replacing highperformance rear-drive variants is going to be nigh on impossible. Which – tissues, please – brings us to this; the last-ever Wheels Falcon v Commodore comparo.

Some of you will be thrilled to bits, cultural cringe in full bloom, relieved that other products will soon dominate the Wheels cover. Not us. Not when Ford’s final Sprint-badged XR6 Turbo and XR8 are bowing out boasting best-ever acceleration and finest-ever handling talent, and Holden’s excellent SS-V Redline sets the benchmark for affordable performance and dynamic ability. So it’s not just with a heavy heart that we’re farewelling Australia’s fiercest and longest-running rivalry, it’s with a legitimate cause for celebration because these rear-drive brutes have never been better.

Or faster. While FPV’s final car – the 351kW GT-F – was a smidge perkier than today’s 345kW XR8 Sprint, the difference is so insignificant as to be virtually redundant. On a perfect surface at Ford’s You Yangs speed bowl in 2014, we clocked 0-100km/h in 4.68sec for the GT-F automatic and standing-400m numbers of 12.68sec and 186.7km/h. Yet here we have the same Smoke Grey XR8 auto that struggled to get its power down at Sydney Dragway a month ago managing to rip through the same increments in record time for this test. And that’s despite its launch control having gone to a long Friday lunch, never to return.

Using a man-made launch technique of giving a touch of throttle while being held on the brake, then squeezing on the power as the XR8 produces the perfect amount of wheelspin from its 265/35ZR19 rear Pirelli P Zeros, that very same XR8 auto nails 100km/h in 4.78sec and the 400m marker in 12.72sec at 186.8km/h.

And it feels fast, revving out cleanly in its first two gears but feeling particularly buxom at the upper end of its speed dial, nailing 0-220km/h two seconds faster than its compatriots. All to the tune of subtle blower whine and a crackling exhaust blurting at each upshift.

Interestingly, the mega-boosted six-pack Falcon can’t beat its V8 stablemate. With launch control at full fitness, the 325kW XR6 is pretty much neck and neck with the XR8 until 70km/h, when the eight begins to assert its dominance. Even at 100km/h, the XR6 is less than one-tenth behind (at 4.84sec) but its standing-400m time tells the true story, registering 12.93sec at 181.5km/h.

And there’s something about the turbo

six’s power delivery that never feels as natural. It won’t rev as freely as the blown V8, as if its ECU is trying to dial back boost pressure – even with 370kW available when overboost is cranking – and it doesn’t sound as characterful, either, unless you prefer a whooshy soundtrack.

Yet it remains super-strong and beautifully smooth, overlaid with lush exhaust blurting on upshifts, and some turbo whistle for good measure. And there’s always its 80-120km/h time to fall back on which, at 2.5sec, is identical to the XR8’s.

Holden’s strident 304kW V8 Commodore might not have the on-paper muscularity of the Fords, or their rolling-start ferocity – clocking 80-120km/h in 3.0sec – but it’s an extremely faithful and consistently strong performer. Off-the-line purchase is much less of a black art and it’s actually the quickest car here to 50km/h (by one tenth over both XRs), but thereafter it gradually concedes ground to the XR8.

Yet who can seriously argue with 4.93sec to 100km/h and a 13.07sec quarter from a $55K automatic sedan?

And no one could complain about the way today’s VF Series II V8 sounds. I began my Wheels career driving Gen III-engined VTIIs and VXs that were relatively weak at the bottom end and way too quiet everywhere, which is something you could never say about this 6.2-litre LS3. Right foot flat, it trumpets a bent-eight bellow into the cabin while thrilling bystanders and passengers alike with its fruity, crackle-laden, quad-exhaust note. And every time you back off the throttle, there’s a hint of overrun crackle as well. GM will need to perform some serious R&D surgery on this car’s twin-turbo V6 successor if it’s ever going to get close to this.

Given the XR6 Sprint’s auto-only status, we chose automatic versions of the XR8 Sprint and SS-V Redline for this test.

All are six-speeders that have since been retired in other markets – long ago in the case of the German-made ZF auto fitted to up-spec Falcons since 2005’s BF update.

Back then, the ZF six-speed lent its posh credentials to high-end Euros like the Audi A8 and Jaguar’s XJ and XK, but they upgraded to eight ratios long ago, leaving the Aussie Fords with a smooth yet ageing transmission that neither matches revs on downshifts nor offers flappy paddles.

The Commodore also relies on a decadeold six-speed auto, GM’s 6L80E that debuted on VE. But it has received several refinements over the years, including a significant recalibration and downshift rev-matching to coincide with the VE Ute intro in 2007, and steering-wheel paddles on VFII in 2015. Because of these improvements, it’s a more versatile ’box than the ZF, and a more cohesive match to the LS3 V8, with a more effective ratio spread, particularly for track work or really tight roads.

The forced-induction Falcons are significantly taller-geared than the atmo Commodore, but with a rev ceiling of 6700rpm versus 6250rpm, the Holden can stretch its shorter legs further to almost match the Fords’ speeds in first gear.

Ford’s turbo six is super-strong and smooth, overlaid with lush upshift exhaust blurting

Class ic SHOWDOWN

September 1988 The ‘aero’ era

Rapid VN Commodore kicked EA Falcon’s butt at the strip, but Ford’s styling set a global benchmark.

Today, the EA is worthless

Cut-out in second sees 123km/h in the Fords and only 110 in the Holden (or 99 at the 6000rpm redline, hence its half-second deficit in rolling-start acceleration), while third gear will stretch to a leggy 190km/h in the Fords and 170 in the Holden.

But it’s cruising in top that defines the difference between the brands. The Fords are geared for 66.9km/h per 1000rpm compared to 58.1, enabling greater use of their torque reserves when devouring country roads… providing you aren’t relying on cruise control.

Where the Commodore’s cruise will kick down a gear, and sometimes two, to maintain speed, filling its cabin with induction richness, the Falcons – particularly the XR8 Sprint – struggle to fulfil the brief. Too much speed washes off before the electronic throttle opens the gas; in the XR8’s case, a really steep hill results in hunting between fifth and sixth, and a drop in pace to as low as 85km/h.

If you interfere and accelerate back up to 110 or so, the cruise picks up where it left off, but it doesn’t make for relaxed highway motoring. And this isn’t an isolated incident. The standard XR8 auto we drove from Melbourne to Bathurst in late-2014 did exactly the same thing… Whether this affected fuel consumption or not is anyone’s guess, but there’s no escaping the Falcons’ greater kerb weight – 1818kg for the XR6 and 1872kg for the XR8 auto versus 1803kg for the SS-V Redline auto – though all of them are built like brick outhouses. And given the performance on offer, their economy is bloody good. The SS-V Redline pips the XR6 by a tiny margin (13.57L/100km against 13.58!) over more than 1000km on test, with the XR8 not far behind at 14.26.

Three litres of additional tank capacity gives the Commodore a greater range, though the Falcon offers a larger 535-litre boot with a handy centre indent to stop cargo sliding around, and a proper split/fold rear backrest compared to the Holden’s broad ski-port with built-in cupholders. But did you know that this very

The forced-induction Fords are significantly taller-geared than the atmo Holden

Class ic SHOWDOWN

September 1993 Stealth fi ghter

ED XR8 Sprint slipped GT’s 200kW V8 into a regular Falcon body while VR Clubsport wore a bodykit styled by Jaguar’s current styling director, Ian Callum

Classic SHOWDOWN

September 2001 Getting warmer

Ford’s reply to Holden’s 225kW VX SS was the sharper, fruitier, more responsive and more fun 220kW AUIII XR8

ski-port originated in a Falcon? It was one of the ‘new’ features on the 1984 XF… Where the Commodore has truly had the upper hand in recent years is chassis dynamics. While the sweet spot in the Falcon line-up has long been the atmo XR6, the Commodore has traditionally shone brightest in its most powerful V8 form, and that still applies to the VF Series II. It will be no secret to Wheels readers that in areas such as driving position, front-seat comfort, mid-corner grip and corner-exit power-down, the Commodore offers solutions to the Falcon’s compromises. But Ford’s comprehensive rethink of the Sprint’s underpinnings has definitely closed the gap.

The biggest surprise, however, is that the XR8 is more polished than the XR6. While feedback from the Sprint media launch on snaking Tasmanian roads nominated the XR6 as the pick, the reality in the real world is the opposite.

Indeed, it’s only on really twisty roads that the XR6 clearly holds a dynamic edge.

And that’s down to its lighter nose. Where the XR8 can wash wide if your cornering approach lacks patience and placement, the XR6’s affinity with nailing tight corner apexes is stronger, and it tucks in tighter until its rear end inevitably lets go.

While the turbo six feels more on its toes in corners, with excellent balance, it suffers from a nervousness that isn’t there in its more planted, less-boosty V8 sibling.

The XR6’s poise on corner exit, however, is dependent entirely on the condition of its 265/35R19 rear Pirellis and the efficacy of its ESC, rather than the inherent purchase of Ford’s ‘Control Blade’ rear-end.

Slightly worn tyres and stability control switched off results in an oversteer arc perfectly in tune with the XR6’s ballsy engine ramping up boost. But it does this vigorously, without the desired throttle progression, making an enthusiastic strafe without an electronic safety net all about oversteer minimisation.

Leave ESC on, however, and the XR6 Sprint keeps it together when pushing hard, with much less electronic intrusion than a non-Sprint XR due to its greater dynamic finesse. But you still need to be considered when it comes to steering inputs because the XR6 is very keen to change direction. Perhaps too keen.

In terms of flat-knacker precision and placement, the XR8 Sprint isn’t quite the six’s equal, but that’s arguably a good thing. Its chassis feels more settled, its power delivery is more progressive, and its steering is meatier, making it an easier car to live with.

There’s a cohesion to the XR8’s dynamics that the XR6 somehow lacks. Even though it concedes ultimate change-of-direction agility, it loves being hustled on faster roads and actually comes alive the harder you drive it. Chuck it really hard into a corner and you can feel the additional weight up front, but it’s so easy to neutralise with a squeeze of the throttle.

And the bond between man and machine grows even stronger the more time you spend with it.

The Commodore has traditionally shone brightest in its most powerful V8 form

But it’s the SS-V Redline that again takes the ‘driver’s car’ gong. Not only does its engine sound gloriously boisterous when you’re up it, the atmo V8’s more progressive grunt delivery means you can give the Commodore the full boot out of corners much earlier, without the threat of snagging its ESC system – incorporating a unique Competition mode in Redline spec that allows greater slip angles – and impeding its fluency.

The SS-V Redline also has more to give through a corner. Its chassis is more faithful and chuckable than the Blue Oval duo’s, with higher grip limits, more consistent balance and an encouraging nature that goads you to drive it harder. It’s more of a young person’s V8, if you will, and yet it’s also smoother-riding, more luxurious and much quieter, with a more expensive feel and next-level comfort.

Inexplicably, the XR8 has a much more fluid ride than the jiggly XR6. It feels more relaxed at all speeds, regardless of the load on board, whereas the knobbly XR6 never quite settles, even carrying four adults.

And then there’s the XR8’s additional steering meat mentioned earlier, which seems to gel better with its suspension tune. Faced with a big-distance bash, we know which one we’d choose.

Right about now I should probably be talking about interiors, and which car has the best seats, the better stereo and all that comparo gumpf, but none of that really matters anymore. Not when this is the end of the line for the Falcons, both of which sold out almost immediately. There’s probably a regular XR8 still hovering about in a dealership somewhere, not to mention an XR6 Turbo or G6E Turbo, but it’s the Sprints that will always be certified as the last, and the best.

Of the two, it’s no surprise by now that we prefer the eight over the six. While the XR6 has its moments, the greater polish of the XR8 wins out for us.

The XR8’s delicious engine and exhaust backing track, mixed with an overlay of blower whine, is utterly addictive – more so than the turbo six’s whistle – and that great big bonnet bulge up front gives it more presence, too. But the smaller build number of the XR6 (500 units for Oz, compared to 750 for the XR8) and its wellliked sticker pack means there’s a strong chance it’ll match the V8’s residual values in the future.

It’s hard to believe it was only 10 years ago that Holden spent a billion Aussie dollars developing the all-new, Zetaplatformed VE, intended at the time to

Class ic SHOWDOWN

September 2004 Six-pack stonk

All-new ‘Alloytec’ 3.6-litre brings VZ SV6 into the 21st century for engine tech.

But BA XR6’s big in-line 4.0 remains the stronger six

underpin a vast swathe of global GM products that never ultimately eventuated.

But if the by-product of that engineering thoroughness is the bank-vault solidity of our 13,500km test Redline – one that has surely been ‘run-in’ with great enthusiasm by the media – then every cent of that investment was money well spent.

Indeed, if the legacy of the Australian auto industry is the VFII Commodore SS-V Redline, then what a way to go out. It’ll be an incredibly hard act to follow when performance versions of the next Opel Insignia replace it, but I bet the Aussies working on the project are fighting hard for something at least as good as this – Holden’s most complete performance car ever.

As for the similarly superb SS-V Redline ute, well, there’s still more than 12 months left in the tank to snap up one of those.

And then, crickets… Ford versus Holden, blue versus red, XR versus SS, Broadmeadows versus Fishermens Bend. In a generation or so the young-uns won’t know how intense the rivalry was, and probably won’t care.

But given the depth of our love for hotblooded Aussie sedans, what you see on these pages isn’t about to be cottonwoolled away for eternity.

Not when it’s all about the driving.

FORD FALCON XR6 SPRINT

$54,990/As tested $54,990

Drivetrain

Engine in-line 6, dohc, 24v, turbo Layout front engine (north-south), rear drive Capacity 3984cc Power 325kW @ 6000rpm Torque 576Nm @ 2750rpm Transmission 6-speed automatic

Chassis

Body steel, 4 doors, 5 seats L/W/H/W–B 4950/1868/1493/2838mm Front/rear track 1583/1598mm Weight 1818kg Boot capacity 535 litres Fuel/capacity 98 octane/68 litres Fuel consumption 13.6L/100km (test average) Suspension Front: double A-arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar Rear: multi-links, coil springs, anti-roll bar Steering power rack-and-pinion Turning Circle 12.3m (2.6 turns lock-to-lock) Front brakes ventilated discs (355mm) Rear brakes ventilated discs (330mm) Tyres Pirelli P Zero Tyre size 245/35ZR19 (f), 265/35ZR19 (r)

Safety

NCAP rating (AUS)

Performance

Power-to-weight: 179kW per tonne Redline/cut-out: 6000/6250rpm Speed at indicated 100km/h: 98 Speed in gears 66km/h @ 6000rpm 118km/h @ 6000rpm 182km/h @ 6000rpm 230km/h @ 5680rpm* 230km/h @ 4350rpm* 230km/h @ 3450rpm* Standing-start acceleration 0-20km/h: 0.9sec 0-40km/h: 1.7sec 0-60km/h: 2.6sec 0-80km/h: 3.7sec 0-100km/h: 4.8sec 0-120km/h: 6.3sec 0-140km/h: 8.2sec 0-160km/h: 10.2sec 0-180km/h: 12.7sec 0-200km/h: 16.5sec 0-220km/h: – 0-400m: 12.9sec @ 181.5km/h Rolling acceleration: Drive 80-12Okm/h: 2.5sec Braking distance 10Okm/h-0: 36.7m 1 2 3 4 5 6

Verdict 7.5/10

Smooth and stealthy; turbo thrust; cool styling mods; almost XR8-quick Lacks throttle progression; jiggly ride; nervy steering; no manual Track: Sydney Dragway, dry. Temp: 20°C.

Driver: Nathan Ponchard *Speed limited.

Warranty: 3yr/100,000km. Service interval: 12 months/15,000km. Glass’s 3-year resale: 43% AAMI insurance: n/a

FORD FALCON XR8 SPRINT

$62,190/As tested $62,690** V8 (90°), dohc, 32v, supercharger front engine (north-south), rear drive 4951cc 345kW @ 5750rpm 575Nm @ 2220-6250rpm 6-speed automatic steel, 4 doors, 5 seats 4950/1868/1493/2838mm 1583/1598mm 1872kg 535 litres 98 octane/68 litres 14.3L/100km (test average) Front: double A-arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar Rear: multi-links, coil springs, anti-roll bar power rack-and-pinion 12.4m (2.4 turns lock-to-lock) ventilated discs (355mm) ventilated discs (330mm) Pirelli P Zero 245/35ZR19 (f), 265/35ZR19 (r) (AUS)

Performance

Power-to-weight: 184kW per tonne Redline/cut-out: 6000/6250rpm Speed at indicated 100km/h: 99 Speed in gears 66km/h @ 6000rpm 118km/h @ 6000rpm 182km/h @ 6000rpm 230km/h @ 5680rpm* 230km/h @ 4350rpm* 230km/h @ 3450rpm* Standing-start acceleration 0-20km/h: 0.8sec 0-40km/h: 1.6sec 0-60km/h: 2.5sec 0-80km/h: 3.6sec 0-100km/h: 4.8sec 0-120km/h: 6.1sec 0-140km/h: 7.9sec 0-160km/h: 9.7sec 0-180km/h: 11.7sec 0-200km/h: 14.8sec 0-220km/h: 18.2sec 0-400m: 12.7sec @ 186.8km/h Rolling acceleration: Drive 80-12Okm/h: 2.5sec Braking distance 10Okm/h-0: 36.9m

8.0/10

More dynamically cohesive than its six-pack sibling; buff and barky V8 Deserved the old FPV GT-P’s seats; average stereo; yesteryear cabin Track: Sydney Dragway, dry. Temp: 22°C.

Driver: Nathan Ponchard *Speed limited.

Warranty: 3yr/100,000km. Service interval: 12 months/15,000km. Glass’s 3-year resale: 43% AAMI insurance: n/a ** Includes metallic paint ($500)

HOLDEN SS-V REDLINE

$56,690/As tested $56,690 V8 (90°), ohv, 16v front engine (north-south), rear drive 6162cc 304kW @ 6000rpm 570Nm @ 4400rpm 6-speed automatic steel, 4 doors, 5 seats 4966/1898/1471/2915mm 1593/1590mm 1803kg 495 litres 98 octane/71 litres 13.6L/100km (test average) Front: struts, A-arms, anti-roll bar Rear: multi-links, coil springs, anti-roll bar electric rack-and-pinion 11.4m (2.7 turns lock-to-lock) ventilated discs (355mm) ventilated discs (360mm) Bridgestone Potenza RE050A 245/40R19 (f), 275/35R19 (r) (AUS)

Performance

Power-to-weight: 169kW per tonne Redline/cut-out: 6000/6700rpm Speed at indicated 100km/h: 95 Speed in gears 58km/h @ 6000rpm 99km/h @ 6000rpm 153km/h @ 6000rpm 203km/h @ 6000rpm 250km/h @ 5450rpm* 250km/h @ 4300rpm* Standing-start acceleration 0-20km/h: 0.8sec 0-40km/h: 1.6sec 0-60km/h: 2.5sec 0-80km/h: 3.6sec 0-100km/h: 4.9sec 0-120km/h: 6.7sec 0-140km/h: 8.4sec 0-160km/h: 10.7sec 0-180km/h: 13.3sec 0-200km/h: 16.7sec 0-220km/h: – 0-400m: 13.1sec @ 178.3km/h Rolling acceleration: Drive 80-12Okm/h: 3.0sec Braking distance 10Okm/h-0: 37.4m

9.0/10

A superb all-round performance car; V8 induction bellow; dynamics; value Not as many USB ports as a Falcon; dated headlights; thick A-pillars Track: Sydney Dragway, dry. Temp: 18°C.

Driver: Nathan Ponchard *Speed limited.

Warranty: 3yr/100,000km. Service interval: 12 months/15,000km. Glass’s 3-year resale: 43% AAMI insurance: $1416